Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Juvenile Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Juvenile Justice - Essay Example Delinquent offender is a crime or antisocial behavior that is committed by juveniles and is also considered as a crime if committed by adults. Status offenses are only committed by juveniles (Elrod and Ryder 362). Juveniles’ courts have intervened in the lives of status offenders. There are several arguments that have been put forward for and against for the legal basis of juvenile courts intervening in the lives of status offenders (Elrod and Ryder 363). Proponents of juvenile court intervention assert that status offenders have unique needs that can only be provided by the juvenile court intervention. For instance, many status offenders suffer from family neglect (Elrod and Ryder 363). Treatment of the status offenders require more financial resources than delinquent offender’s treatment thus this services can only be provided by juvenile courts. Status offenses will escalate to more criminal behaviors in the future since running away from home may lead to robbery if the courts fail to intervene. Status offenders are at more risk of victimization and death since incorrigibility expose the youths to drugs and prostitution. Juvenile courts have a primary mission of protecting the interests of children thus they have a duty of supporting lawful parental authority. Compulsory education laws would be undermined if juvenile courts relinquish authority over status offenders (Elrod and Ryder 363). On the other hand, critics of juvenile court involvement in Status offender lives assert that such intervention is ineffective and inappropriate since it may lead to more harm (Elrod and Ryder 364). Social agencies are better equipped to deal with Status offenders since juvenile courts lack the necessary expertise and financial resources to offer the required services. The processing of the status offense lead to labeling thus status offenders receive harsh punishment and are likely to engage in more antisocial behaviors (Elrod and Ryder 364). Status offenses revolve around family problems thus no need of juvenile court intervention since it hinders the responsibility of schools and social institutions in solving the community problems (Elrod and Ryder 364). In my opinion, the juvenile courts should not intervene in Status offenses since it is a violation of the constitution since all citizens should be protected equally regardless of age, race or color. The laws tend to be harsh towards children from poor families who are more likely to be subjected to cruel punishment like the delinquent offenders. Such intervention removes the parental responsibility on the behavior of juveniles and transfers it to the children. Juvenile courts involvement in the lives of status offenders dates back to the development of the parens patriae legal concept (Elrod and Ryder 365). Juvenile courts were designed to deal with delinquent juveniles and also troublesome children. The state has the duty to protect children and several statutes outline the duties of parents and teachers to the children. Legal statutes require the children to attend school regularly and obey curfews, and not to run away from the family (Elrod and Ryder 366). Some states refer status offenders as children in need of supervision (CHINS). The historical basis for juvenile courts intervention in status offenders is rooted in the Biblical passage that children are supposed to obey their parents

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

SIOP component unit Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

SIOP component unit - Essay Example In this case, the use of the right vocabularies is paramount. This is because; applying the right vocabularies, as a teaching mode ensures the learners obtains the desired understanding. The rightful use of vocabularies enhances academic excellence. This component entails the active participation of the learners in repeatedly synthesizing and applying the words learnt to ensure that they not only understand their meaning, but that they also know the words and vocabularies usability. Putting the word in different applications ensures that the learners are in a position to understand the context in which it is used better (Ajzen 1984). According to the Arizona Standards (2010), students are supposed to study both primary and secondary sources of information, analyzing and evaluating them. They should also be in a position to differentiate between the two sources. Such are the characteristics of the Building Background component of the SIOP. The strategies applicable under this componen t to enhance better understanding of the subject content by the learners are the substance summary strategies. According to the ELL standards for lesson plan, the students’ performance should be evaluated continuously, based on their ability to speak, read, and write. Here, the subject teacher will guide the students in reading some information regarding the subject in question. The teacher will then assist the learners in indentifying the core words and vocabularies of that piece of information. These words and vocabularies, being the substance of the topic in that subject are then applied to summarize the whole piece or topic into a few notes or paragraphs. It is through doing so, that the students will better understand the vocabularies usage in the topic, and the whole substance or content of that topic (Ajzen 1984). These strategies are well integrated with the above-mentioned component, in that the substantial words and vocabularies of a topic or piece of work are used as the basis of understanding the subject content. The strategies selected for application under this component well indicates that the learners will understand the content of their subject better, through having ample experiences and backgrounds. By indentifying the core words and vocabularies that are the substance of a reading, the learners obtain the desired experience in words and vocabularies usability, when they apply them in summarizing the content of the reading. Lesson plan: Standards: Research Skills for History according to Arizona Standards Strand 2: World History Concept 4: Building Background Topic: World History Concept 1: Research skills for history according to Arizona standards. Class: Lesson integrated to the understanding of World history well integrated to English language, through reading, writing, listening, and observing material artifacts. Date: January 27, 2012 Content Objectives: The learners will be in a position to understand and explain through oral an d written modes, what world history is and the relevant research skills for history. Arizona standards objective: The learners will, by the end of the lesson, be able to analyze, evaluate and differentiate secondary from primary sources of historical information. ELL objectives The teacher should continuously asses the students language ability through the way they